Krasner v. Reed
This text of 30 So. 2d 734 (Krasner v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals. One of the prerequisites to invoking the jurisdiction of this court for such a review is that the application for certiorari be accompanied by a brief pointing out and arguing .the point or decision sought to be revised, with a certification attached or embodied therein that a copy of said brief has been served on counsel for the opposing side, if the adverse party was represented by counsel in the Court of Appeals. Supreme Court Rule 44, as amended, Code 1940, Title 7 Appendix:
The rule was not complied with. No brief accompanied the application and, of consequence, the petition must be dismissed. Allen v. State, ante, p. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Gulf, M. & O. R. Co. v. Scott, 248 Ala. 250, 27 So.2d 152; Ex parte Locklear, 205 Ala. 236, 87 So. 712; Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards, 202 Ala. 503, 80 So. 794. Petition dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 So. 2d 734, 249 Ala. 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krasner-v-reed-ala-1947.