Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards

80 So. 791, 202 Ala. 503
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 13, 1919·No. 6 Div. 878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

McCLELLAN, j.

Amended rule 42, reproduced on page vii, 77 South.,1 requires an application for certiorari to be accompanied by a brief “pointing out and arguing the point or decision sought to be revised and a certificate” to be attached to or embodied therein affirming that “a copy of said brief has been served on counsel” for the opposite party, if the adverse party was represented by counsel in the Court of Appeals. The petition for certiorari in the present instance is not accompanied by a brief in support thereof. Because of the failure to observe the stated rule, the petition for certiorari must be dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SATRE and GARDNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards, 80 So. 791, 202 Ala. 503 (Ala. 1919).

80 So. 791 (Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Krasner v. Reed
30 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Burch v. State
29 So. 2d 425 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1947)
Gulf, M. O. R. Co. v. Scott
27 So. 2d 152 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)