Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards
This text of 80 So. 791 (Birmingham Waterworks Co. v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Amended rule 42, reproduced on page vii, 77 South.,1 requires an application for certiorari to be accompanied by a brief “pointing out and arguing the point or decision sought to be revised and a certificate” to be attached to or embodied therein affirming that “a copy of said brief has been served on counsel” for the opposite party, if the adverse party was represented by counsel in the Court of Appeals. The petition for certiorari in the present instance is not accompanied by a brief in support thereof. Because of the failure to observe the stated rule, the petition for certiorari must be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 So. 791, 202 Ala. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/birmingham-waterworks-co-v-edwards-ala-1919.