Kramer v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Florida

Kramer v. Barnett

123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 427

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 17, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *428 the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed. .

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of *428 the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed. .

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur.

Kramer v. Barnett, 123 So. 819, 98 Fla. 427 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

123 So. 819 (Kramer v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.