Kramer v. Barnett

Supreme Court of Florida

Kramer v. Barnett

114 So. 144, 94 Fla. 297

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 20, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the order .of the Chancellor sustaining exceptions to and striking the answer interposed to a bill to foreclose a mortgage.

The order of the Chancellor should be sustained on authority of the opinion in the case of Wayne Realty and Investment Company v. Whitten et ux, 90 Fla. 433, 106 So. 125, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from the order .of the Chancellor sustaining exceptions to and striking the answer interposed to a bill to foreclose a mortgage.

The order of the Chancellor should be sustained on authority of the opinion in the case of Wayne Realty and Investment Company v. Whitten et ux, 90 Fla. 433, 106 So. 125, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitpield, P. J., and Terrell and Bupord, J. J., concur.

Kramer v. Barnett, 114 So. 144, 94 Fla. 297 (Fla. 1927).

Pincite

114 So. 144 (Kramer v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related