Krajewski v. Bommarito

Michigan Court of Appeals

Krajewski v. Bommarito

16 Mich. App. 196

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 1969

DocketDocket No 4,978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Mich. App. 196 (Krajewski v. Bommarito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krajewski v. Bommarito, 16 Mich. App. 196 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff brought action against defendants for malicious prosecution and conspiracy to commit malicious prosecution. At the close of the proofs, defendants moved for a directed verdict, which was denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and defendants moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The trial court denied the motion, but did order a remittitur.

The trial was fair and impartial, the issues .0' law were properly considered and decided by the trial court, and the issues of fact were submitted N the jury with proper instructions.

The questions of fact, having been decided adversely to the defendant by the jury, provide n~ grounds for reversal unless there is substantial error.

A review of the record does not indicate such error, and the judgment of the trial court should be sustained.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI