Kowalski v. City of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kowalski v. City of Poughkeepsie

9 A.D.2d 685, 191 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6728

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 A.D.2d 685 (Kowalski v. City of Poughkeepsie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kowalski v. City of Poughkeepsie, 9 A.D.2d 685, 191 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6728 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of respondent. Respondent was injured when a raised portion of a sidewalk caused her to fall. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Actual oral notice of a defective condition given to an authorized employee in the office of the Superintendent of Public Works is sufficient compliance with the requirements of section 200 of the Charter of the City of Poughkeepsie (L. 1896, eh. 425, as amd.; Elias v. City of Rochester, 49 App. Div. 597, affd. 169 N. Y. 614). Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of respondent. Respondent was injured when a raised portion of a sidewalk caused her to fall. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Actual oral notice of a defective condition given to an authorized employee in the office of the Superintendent of Public Works is sufficient compliance with the requirements of section 200 of the Charter of the City of Poughkeepsie (L. 1896, eh. 425, as amd.; Elias v. City of Rochester, 49 App. Div. 597, affd. 169 N. Y. 614). Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 685, 191 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kowalski-v-city-of-poughkeepsie-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack