Kovrak v. Ginsburg

358 U.S. 52, 79 S. Ct. 95, 3 L. Ed. 2d 46, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 276

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 20, 1958·No. 266·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

358 U.S. 52 (1958)

KOVRAK
v.
GINSBURG ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF THE LAW.

No. 266.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 20, 1958. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT.

Filindo B. Masino and William B. Ball for appellant.

Robert W. Lees for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

358 U.S. 52 (1958)

KOVRAK
v.
GINSBURG ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF THE LAW.

No. 266.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 20, 1958. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, EASTERN DISTRICT.

Filindo B. Masino and William B. Ball for appellant.

Robert W. Lees for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Kovrak v. Ginsburg, 358 U.S. 52, 79 S. Ct. 95, 3 L. Ed. 2d 46, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 276 (1958).

Pincite

358 U.S. 52 (Kovrak v. Ginsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Frazier

594 F. Supp. 1173 (E.D. Louisiana, 1984)

439 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1979)

Brown v. Supreme Court of Virginia

359 F. Supp. 549 (E.D. Virginia, 1973)

Martin v. Walton

368 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1961)

Application of Avery

352 P.2d 607 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1959)