Korman v. City of New York

89 A.D.2d 888, 453 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18062
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 16, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 89 A.D.2d 888 (Korman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Korman v. City of New York, 89 A.D.2d 888, 453 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated January 7, 1982, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to its original determination which granted a motion by the defendant City of New York to change venue from Kings County to New York County. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, the prior order, dated December 12, 1980, is vacated, and the motion to change venue is denied, without prejudice to a further motion by the City of New York in accordance herewith. The cause of action for personal injuries arose in New York County where plaintiff Jack Korman tripped in a hole in a sidewalk. The City of New York served an answer which had attached to it a demand for a change of venue. The plaintiffs did nothing. The City of New York permitted more than 15 days after service of the demand to pass and, therefore, was no longer entitled to relief under CPLR 511. Fourteen months after the joinder of issue, at a precalendar conference, the City of New York orally moved for a change of venue. Special Term granted the motion and changed the venue to New York County. The transfer of the action from Kings County to New York County on oral motion was improper. When the City of New York failed to comply with CPLR 511, the only method of seeking a change of venue was by notice of motion pursuant to CPLR 510 and 2212. Such motion may be made any time before trial and is subject to the court’s discretion. In the absence of a stipulation entered into at the precalendar conference dispensing with usual formalities, a venue motion must be on papers. Titone, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Amedure v. State of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 24082 (New York Supreme Court, Saratoga County, 2024)
Rutherford v. Patel
129 A.D.3d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Gangi v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
14 A.D.3d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Charles v. New York City Transit Authority
277 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Lopez v. Robbins
269 A.D.2d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Runcie v. Cross County Shopping Mall
268 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Amy L. M. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District
199 A.D.2d 477 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Gennaro v. Grossfeld
186 A.D.2d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Soufan v. Argo Pneumatic Co.
170 A.D.2d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Campos v. New York City Health & Hospital Corp.
163 A.D.2d 49 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Toro v. Gracin
148 A.D.2d 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Brevetti v. Roth
114 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.2d 888, 453 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1982.