Korman v. City of New York
This text of 84 A.D.2d 559 (Korman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated December 12,1980, which granted a motion by the defendant City of New York to change venue from Kings County to New York County. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements, and without prejudice to plaintiffs’ moving (if they be so advised) to vacate the order or to resettle the order upon evidence that it was in fact opposed. The order appealed from states [560]*560that the motion to change venue was made on an “oral application” and that “no opposition * * * [was] made thereon”. Although plaintiffs’ brief states that the order was “never consented to” and that plaintiffs did not stipulate to a change of venue, there is nothing in the record to show that the motion was opposed. Damiani, J. P., Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.2d 559, 443 N.Y.S.2d 272, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1981.