Korina Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Korina Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

267 A.D.2d 38, 700 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12695

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 267 A.D.2d 38 (Korina Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Korina Restaurant & Bar, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 267 A.D.2d 38, 700 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12695 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered December 3, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority, which found that petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6), suspended petitioner’s liquor license for 10 days and imposed a $1,500 penalty, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

By entering its “no contest” plea, petitioner waived its right to a review of the facts upon which the punishment was imposed (9 NYCRR 54.2; Matter of Kufs v State of N. Y. Liq. Auth., 224 AD2d 974; Matter of Barotti v New York State Liq. Auth., 82 AD2d 1004, 1005). The penalty imposed was appropriate, notwithstanding the IAS Court’s partial annulment [39]*39of the challenged determination (see, Matter of La Trieste Rest. & Cabaret v New York State Liq. Auth., 228 AD2d 172). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom, Mazzarelli and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered December 3, 1998, which, to the extent appealed from, denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent New York State Liquor Authority, which found that petitioner had violated Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6), suspended petitioner’s liquor license for 10 days and imposed a $1,500 penalty, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

By entering its “no contest” plea, petitioner waived its right to a review of the facts upon which the punishment was imposed (9 NYCRR 54.2; Matter of Kufs v State of N. Y. Liq. Auth., 224 AD2d 974; Matter of Barotti v New York State Liq. Auth., 82 AD2d 1004, 1005). The penalty imposed was appropriate, notwithstanding the IAS Court’s partial annulment [39]*39of the challenged determination (see, Matter of La Trieste Rest. & Cabaret v New York State Liq. Auth., 228 AD2d 172). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Tom, Mazzarelli and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 A.D.2d 38, 700 N.Y.S.2d 673, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/korina-restaurant-bar-inc-v-new-york-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack