Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.

787 P.2d 896
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 7, 1990·No. A8806-03389 CA A60749·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

787 P.2d 896 (1990)
100 Or.App. 649

Michael KORBUT, Sr., Personal Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Korbut, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK CO.; Black Corporation; and White Co., Defendants, and Sterling Drug, Inc., Dba Glenbrook Laboratories; and Fred Meyer, Inc., Respondents.

No. A8806-03389; CA A60749.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 7, 1990.
Argued and Submitted February 14, 1990.
Reconsideration Denied April 25, 1990.
Review Denied May 22, 1990.

J. Randolph Pickett, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was J. Randolph Pickett, P.C., Portland.

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Laurence F. Janssen, Vivian Raits Solomon, and Spears, Lubersky, Bledsoe, Anderson, Young & Hilliard, Portland; and Robert L. Kaufman, Kathryn M. Forgie, Rebecca D. Wynn and Haight, Brown and Bonesteel, Santa Monica, California.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a wrongful death action based on defective product allegations. The death occurred in 1982. The action was brought in 1988. The trial court granted defendants a summary judgment on the basis of Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General Hospital, 307 Or. 500, 769 P.2d 775 (1989). We are bound by that decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co., 787 P.2d 896 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

787 P.2d 896 (Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
50 P.3d 1163 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2002)
Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
21 P.3d 1089 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)
Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.
811 P.2d 627 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1991)