Koon v. Insurance Co.

Supreme Court

Koon v. Insurance Co.

104 U.S. 106, 26 L. Ed. 670, 14 Otto 106, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 1975

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 14, 1881

Docket77

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 104 U.S. 106 (Koon v. Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koon v. Insurance Co., 104 U.S. 106, 26 L. Ed. 670, 14 Otto 106, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 1975 (1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The stipulation “ that the jury might, when they had agreed on their, verdict, if the court should not then be in session, sign and seal the same,, and deliver the same to the officer in charge and disperse,” was equivalent to an agreement by both parties, on the retirement of the jury, that the court might, when 'the sealed verdict was handed in by the officer, open it in the absence of the jury and reduce it to proper form, if necessary.' The stipulation was also a waiver of the right to poll the jury if they should not be in court.

The issue to be tried was on a plea of nil debet. This admitted the execution of the bond, and required the jury only to find the amount due.. If anything was found to be due, the law fixed the form of the verdict and judgment. The jury found there was $7,500 due on the debt and one cent damages for the detention. That finding, reduced to proper form, was in favor of the plaintiff for the penalty of the bond, to be discharged on payment of $7,500. All the court did was to enter the verdict in that form. In doing so it only gave legal effect to what the jury unmistakably found. This was allowable,, both under sect.' 954 of the Revised Statutes aiid the Practice Act of Illinois.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The stipulation “ that the jury might, when they had agreed on their, verdict, if the court should not then be in session, sign and seal the same,, and deliver the same to the officer in charge and disperse,” was equivalent to an agreement by both parties, on the retirement of the jury, that the court might, when 'the sealed verdict was handed in by the officer, open it in the absence of the jury and reduce it to proper form, if necessary.' The stipulation was also a waiver of the right to poll the jury if they should not be in court.

The issue to be tried was on a plea of nil debet. This admitted the execution of the bond, and required the jury only to find the amount due.. If anything was found to be due, the law fixed the form of the verdict and judgment. The jury found there was $7,500 due on the debt and one cent damages for the detention. That finding, reduced to proper form, was in favor of the plaintiff for the penalty of the bond, to be discharged on payment of $7,500. All the court did was to enter the verdict in that form. In doing so it only gave legal effect to what the jury unmistakably found. This was allowable,, both under sect.' 954 of the Revised Statutes aiid the Practice Act of Illinois.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 U.S. 106, 26 L. Ed. 670, 14 Otto 106, 1881 U.S. LEXIS 1975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koon-v-insurance-co-scotus-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack