Komatsu v. The City of New York

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 8/20/2021 TOWAKIKOMATSU, 20-CV-10942 (VEC) (RWL) Plaintiff, :

- against - ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al, Defendants.

ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to the filing restrictions imposed in this case, the letter at Dkt. 105 shall be stricken. The letter is vexatious, serves no purpose other than to insult and impugn a district judge and the integrity of the judiciary, and identifies no particular request for legal relief. The letter also purports to be a response to the Court's order dated August 18, 2021; that order, however, did not invite a response. To the extent that Plaintiff's filing may be construed as a motion to reconsider (although it in no way asks for that relief), it fails to meet the requirements. As the Court previously explained in denying Plaintiff's previous motion for reconsideration, the legal standard governing motions for reconsideration “is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked.” Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P., 684 F.3d 36, 52 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995)). Plaintiff has not identified anything that the Court overlooked.

SO ORDERED.

ROBERT W.LEHRBURGER UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: August 20, 2021 New York, New York The Clerk of Court is instructed to mail a copy of this Order to the Pro Se Plaintiff.