Komatsu v. The City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 29, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-07046·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TOWAKI KOMATSU, Plaintiff, 20-CV-7046 (ER) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants. EDGARDO RAMOS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff, appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988, and state law, alleging that Defendants unlawfully prevented him from attending two public meetings. By order dated September 25, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (IFP). DISCUSSION A. Service on Named Defendants Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that the summonses and complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served the summonses and complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date the summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that time, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki, 378 F. App’x 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals’ failure to effect service

automatically constitutes ‘good cause’ for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants the City of New York; NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond; former NYPD Lieutenant Ralph Nieves; NYPD Officer Karl Pfeffer; NYPD Officer Andrew Berkowitz; NYPD Officer Cruz; NYPD Officer Hansen; NYPD Officer Christopher Fowler; NYPD Officer Lance; NYPD Officer Juanita Holmes; NYPD Lieutenant Richard Mantellino; Mayor Bill de Blasio; and former NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each of these defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all

the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon these defendants. Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so. B. John Doe Defendant Under Valentin v. Dinkins, a pro se litigant is entitled to assistance from the district court in identifying a defendant. 121 F.3d 72, 76 (2d Cir. 1997). In the complaint, Plaintiff supplies sufficient information to permit the New York City Police Department (NYPD) to identify the “NYPD Officer John Doe8-30-17a” whom Plaintiff describes in the complaint. (See ECF No. 5, at 11 ¶ 5.) It is therefore ordered that the New York City Law Department, which is the attorney for and agent of the NYPD, shall ascertain the identity of the John Doe defendant whom Plaintiff seeks to sue here and the address where this defendant may be served. The New York City Law Department shall provide this information to Plaintiff and the Court within sixty days of the date of this order. Within thirty days of receiving this information, Plaintiff must file a second amended

complaint naming the John Doe defendants. The second amended complaint will replace, not supplement, the amended complaint. A Second Amended Complaint form that Plaintiff should complete is attached to this order. Once Plaintiff has filed a second amended complaint, the Court will screen the second amended complaint and, if necessary, issue an order directing the Clerk of Court to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for the named John Doe defendant and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, together with an information package. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for City of New York; NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond; former NYPD Lieutenant

Ralph Nieves; NYPD Officer Karl Pfeffer; NYPD Officer Andrew Berkowitz; NYPD Officer Cruz; NYPD Officer Hansen; NYPD Officer Christopher Fowler; NYPD Officer Lance; NYPD Officer Juanita Holmes; NYPD Lieutenant Richard Mantellino; Mayor Bill de Blasio; and former NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill, issue summonses, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail a copy of this order and the complaint to the New York City Law Department at: 100 Church Street, New York, NY 10007. A Second Amended Complaint form is attached to this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 29, 2020 . New York, New York a Bane BDGARDORAMOS” st” United States District Judge

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES City of New York 100 Church Street New York, NY 10007 NYPD Inspector Howard Redmond NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Lieutenant Ralph Nieves Tax # 902104 New York Police Department 1 Police Plaza Room 110C New York, NY 10038 NYPD Officer Karl Pfeffer Officer ID # 48458 NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Officer Andrew Berkowitz Badge # 7141 NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Officer Cruz Badge # 751 NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Officer Hansen Badge # 4028 NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Officer Christopher Fowler Badge # 3185 NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Officer Lance Badge # 245 NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Officer Juanita Holmes NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYPD Lieutenant Richard Mantellino NYC Mayor Security Detail City Hall New York, NY 10007 Mayor Bill de Blasio City Hall New York, NY 10007 James O’Neill, former NYPD Commissioner New York Police Department 1 Police Plaza Room 110C New York, NY 10038

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Write the full name of each plaintiff. _____CV_______________ (Include case number if one has been assigned) -against- SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Do you want a jury trial? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Write the full name of each defendant. If you need more space, please write “see attached” in the space above and attach an additional sheet of paper with the full list of names. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section II.

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Komatsu v. The City of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Komatsu v. The City of New York (Komatsu v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murray v. Pataki
378 F. App'x 50 (Second Circuit, 2010)
Meilleur v. Strong
682 F.3d 56 (Second Circuit, 2012)
Walker v. Schult
717 F.3d 119 (Second Circuit, 2013)