Kokoski v. Felts
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6540
MICHAEL ALLEN KOKOSKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES FELTS, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00024)
Submitted: June 8, 2007 Decided: July 3, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Allen Kokoski, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Allen Kokoski appeals the district court order
granting his motion to have the court review the record and denying
his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the
district court. See Kokoski v. Felts, No. 5:06-cv-00024 (S.D. W.
Va. Mar. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kokoski v. Felts (Kokoski v. Felts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.