Kokoski v. Felts

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2007·No. 07-6540·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6540

MICHAEL ALLEN KOKOSKI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES FELTS, Warden,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (5:06-cv-00024)

Submitted: June 8, 2007 Decided: July 3, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Allen Kokoski, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michael Allen Kokoski appeals the district court order

granting his motion to have the court review the record and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

the district court order and affirm for the reasons cited by the

district court. See Kokoski v. Felts, No. 5:06-cv-00024 (S.D. W.

Va. Mar. 6, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kokoski v. Felts, (4th Cir. 2007).

Kokoski v. Felts (Kokoski v. Felts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.