Kokoski v. Felts

Fourth Circuit

Kokoski v. Felts

235 F. App'x 176

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2007·No. 07-6617·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Allen Kokoski, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2007) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Kokoski v. Felts, No. 5:06-cv-00763, 2007 WL 1112565 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

Insofar as Kokoski seeks authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Allen Kokoski, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2007) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Kokoski v. Felts, No. 5:06-cv-00763, 2007 WL 1112565 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

Insofar as Kokoski seeks authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny relief.

Kokoski v. Felts, 235 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

235 F. App'x 176 (Kokoski v. Felts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related