Kohoot v. Gurbisz
139 A. 223, 101 N.J. Eq. 757, 16 Stock. 757, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 603
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. *Page 761 For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kohoot v. Gurbisz, 139 A. 223, 101 N.J. Eq. 757, 16 Stock. 757, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 603 (N.J. 1927).
139 A. 223 (Kohoot v. Gurbisz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Technology for Energy Corp. (In Re Technology for Energy Corp.)
140 B.R. 214 (E.D. Tennessee, 1992)
Garcia v. Karam
276 S.W.2d 255 (Texas Supreme Court, 1955)
Richeimer v. Fischbein
153 A. 514 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1931)
Richeimer v. Fischbein
149 A. 26 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)