Kohoot v. Gurbisz

139 A. 223, 101 N.J. Eq. 757, 16 Stock. 757, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 603
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 17, 1927
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 139 A. 223 (Kohoot v. Gurbisz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kohoot v. Gurbisz, 139 A. 223, 101 N.J. Eq. 757, 16 Stock. 757, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 603 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin. *Page 761 For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. Karam
276 S.W.2d 255 (Texas Supreme Court, 1955)
Richeimer v. Fischbein
153 A. 514 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1931)
Richeimer v. Fischbein
149 A. 26 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A. 223, 101 N.J. Eq. 757, 16 Stock. 757, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohoot-v-gurbisz-nj-1927.