Kohn v. Kohn

California Court of Appeal

Kohn v. Kohn

214 P.2d 79, 95 Cal. App. 2d 918, 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1060

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 26, 1950

DocketCiv. No. 14106

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 P.2d 79 (Kohn v. Kohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohn v. Kohn, 214 P.2d 79, 95 Cal. App. 2d 918, 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1060 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

DOOLING, J.

Defendant appeals from an order directing him to pay plaintiff for her support under the terms of a final decree of divorce at the rate of $530.40 per month during the year 1948. The amount is based upon the net earnings of defendant in 1947 calculated in accordance with the property settlement agreement which was made a part of the decree, and has been construed in Kohn v. Kohn, Civ. No. 14017, ante, p. 708 [214 P.2d 71], this day filed. Two items of income included by the court are questioned: 1. a sum paid to defendant as salary by Federated Investment Company which the court treated as a dividend; and 2. income received from property acquired from the estate of George Kohn, deceased.

Appellant’s similar contentions in Kohn v. Kohn, Civ. N. 14017, ante, p. 708 [214 P.2d 71], were disposed of adversely to him and no purpose would be served by repeating the discussion of them.

Order affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Goodell, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied February 25, 1950, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 23, 1950. Schauer, J., voted for a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOOLING, J.

Defendant appeals from an order directing him to pay plaintiff for her support under the terms of a final decree of divorce at the rate of $530.40 per month during the year 1948. The amount is based upon the net earnings of defendant in 1947 calculated in accordance with the property settlement agreement which was made a part of the decree, and has been construed in Kohn v. Kohn, Civ. No. 14017, ante, p. 708 [214 P.2d 71], this day filed. Two items of income included by the court are questioned: 1. a sum paid to defendant as salary by Federated Investment Company which the court treated as a dividend; and 2. income received from property acquired from the estate of George Kohn, deceased.

Appellant’s similar contentions in Kohn v. Kohn, Civ. N. 14017, ante, p. 708 [214 P.2d 71], were disposed of adversely to him and no purpose would be served by repeating the discussion of them.

Order affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Goodell, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied February 25, 1950, and appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied March 23, 1950. Schauer, J., voted for a hearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 P.2d 79, 95 Cal. App. 2d 918, 1950 Cal. App. LEXIS 1060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohn-v-kohn-calctapp-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack