Kohli v. Dayal

Opinion

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7

8 ERIC KOHLI, Case No. 2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10 v. [Docket Nos. 118, 133] 11 AJAY DAYAL, et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is an order for Defendants Quantified Investment Group, LLC 14 and Quantified Capital Group, LLC to show cause arising out of the requirement that corporate 15 entities can proceed in federal court only with licensed counsel. Docket No. 118 (citing United 16 States v. High Country Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993)).1 Defendants Quantified 17 Investment Group, LLC and Quantified Capital Group, LLC filed a response. Docket No. 129. 18 Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to respond, attaching a proposed opposition. Docket No. 133.2 19 The most recent deadline to retain counsel was set for May 5, 2023, Docket No. 125, and 20 licensed counsel appeared for these two corporate entities on that date, Docket No. 126. 21 Accordingly, the Court DISCHARGES the order to show cause as it relates to Defendants 22 Quantified Investment Group, LLC and Quantified Capital Group, LLC. Counsel for Defendants 23 Quantified Investment Group, LLC and Quantified Capital Group, LLC must immediately 24 25 1 The order to show cause is also addressed to Pacific Bay Lending Group and Miss Elegant 26 Expo. See Docket No. 118. The Court addresses that aspect of the order to show cause in a report and recommendation issued concurrently herewith. 27 2 Plaintiff’s motion for leave is GRANTED. The Court has considered herein the 28 substance of the proposed opposition. Docket No. 133-1. 1} familiarize himself with the local rules of this District and must ensure that his future filings 2|| conform to those rules. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: July 28, 2023

Nancy J. Koppe, 6 United Statés“Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28