Kohli v. Dayal

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7| ERIC KOHLI, Case No. 2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9} v. [Docket No. 96] 10] AJAY G. DAYAL, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is a motion for attorney Brandon Phillips to withdraw as counsel 13] for Defendants. Docket No. 96. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 98. Attorney 14] Phillips filed a reply. Docket No. 100. The Court hereby SETS this motion for a hearing at 2:00 15] p.m. on January 17, 2023, in Courtroom 3C. Defendant Ajay G. Dayal must appear at this 16] hearing in person and the corporate defendants must also appear at the hearing in person 17| through a corporate representative.’ FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY 18] RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS, UP TO AND INCLUDING CASE- 19] DISPOSITIVE SANCTIONS. 20 Attorney Brandon must promptly provide Defendants with a copy of this order and must 21|| file a proof of service by December 22, 2022. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: December 14, 2022 . 24 fp), ba Ms “ fo a Nancy J. Koppe 25 United States Magistrate Judge 26 27), ————_____ ' The Court reminds the parties that corporations are not permitted to proceed pro se. See 28|| United States v. High Country Broad. Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993).