Kohler v. Klein

39 Misc. 353, 79 N.Y.S. 866
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Gaynor, J.:

The plaintiff was expelled without notice or hearing from a subordinate lodge of the order. The defendant objects to this court taking jurisdiction of the case, on the ground that the plaintiff by his contract with the defendant is given the right to appeal to a higher authority in the order, and has not done so. The constitution of the order provides that any member “who deems himself aggrieved by a decision of the order is within three months entitled to appeal to the grand committee.” I do not think the expulsion of the plaintiff without notice and hearing was a “ decision ” within the meaning of this provision (People ex rel. Deverell v. Musical Union, 118 N. Y. 101). It contemplates a decision of some question lawfully up for decision.

Judgment for the plaintiff, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kohler v. Klein, 39 Misc. 353, 79 N.Y.S. 866 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

39 Misc. 353 (Kohler v. Klein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blake v. North Shore Multiple Listing Service, Inc.
81 Misc. 2d 793 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Levy v. Amateur Skating Union of United States
56 Misc. 2d 257 (New York Supreme Court, 1968)
Fanara v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
205 Misc. 538 (New York Supreme Court, 1954)
Irwin v. Possehl
143 Misc. 855 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)
Rodier v. Huddell
232 A.D. 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Rueb v. Rehder
174 P. 992 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1918)