Koethe v. O'Brien
This text of 19 N.W. 388 (Koethe v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The motion was made on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence. The respondent here makes the objection that not only was no case or bill of exceptions allowed or signed by the judge, but the so-called “case” does not show that it contains the whole of the evidence on the issue or issues as to which it is claimed that the verdict is against the evidence. The objection is well taken. Henry v. Hinman, 21 Minn. 378 ; Abrahams v. Sheehan, 27 Minn. 401.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 N.W. 388, 32 Minn. 78, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koethe-v-obrien-minn-1884.