Abrahams v. Sheehan
7 N.W. 822, 27 Minn. 401, 1881 Minn. LEXIS 11
Opinion
In this case the “statement of the case,” though stipulated by the attorneys for the respective parties, was not allowed and signed by the judge. The objection ia made here by the respondents that no exceptions appearing only on the statement can be considered here, because it is not. signed by the judge. The point is well taken. The statute expressly provides for allowance and signature by the judge, (Gen. St. 1878, c. 66, § 255,) and we do not think it can be dispensed with. Leonard v. Warriner, 20 Wis. 41.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abrahams v. Sheehan, 7 N.W. 822, 27 Minn. 401, 1881 Minn. LEXIS 11 (Mich. 1881).
7 N.W. 822 (Abrahams v. Sheehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Merchants & Farmers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.
16 N.W.2d 463 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1944)
State Ex Rel. Yapp v. Chase
206 N.W. 396 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)
Sweet v. Myers
53 N.W. 187 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Koethe v. O'Brien
19 N.W. 388 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1884)
Sherman v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.
15 N.W. 239 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1883)