Koester v. State

71 S.W.2d 272, 126 Tex. Crim. 261, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 630
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 9, 1934
DocketNo. 16674.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 71 S.W.2d 272 (Koester v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koester v. State, 71 S.W.2d 272, 126 Tex. Crim. 261, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 630 (Tex. 1934).

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

Conviction is for being a delinquent child; punishment, confinement in the boys’ training school for two years.

The points relied upon for reversal are of a nature requiring an examination of the statement of facts. The statement of facts brought before this court is in question and answer *262 form. The statute demands that it be in narrative form. Article 760, C. C. P., Mitchell v. State, 54 S. W. (2d) 107. The motion of the State’s attorney before this court that the statement of facts be not considered must be sustained.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newsom v. State
169 S.W.2d 195 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Phillips v. State
111 S.W.2d 709 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Henry v. State
111 S.W.2d 722 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 S.W.2d 272, 126 Tex. Crim. 261, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koester-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.