Koehl v. Mirza
915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 759
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Koehl v. Mirza. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.Y.3d 897 →
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, this Court’s November 27, 2007 dismissal or[760]*760der vacated and appeal reinstated (see Koehl u Mirza, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2734 [2009]; Haywood v Drown, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Koehl v. Mirza, 915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 759 (N.Y. 2009).
915 N.E.2d 1158 (Koehl v. Mirza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haywood v. Drown
556 U.S. 729 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Koehl v. Mirza
129 S. Ct. 2734 (Supreme Court, 2009)