Koehl v. Mirza

922 N.E.2d 873, 13 N.Y.3d 897
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 17, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, without costs, by reinstating plaintiffs claims under 42 USC § 1983 and remitting the case to Supreme Court, Clinton County, for further proceedings on those claims, and, as so modified, affirmed (see Haywood v Drown, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009], on remand 13 NY3d 760 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koehl v. Mirza, 922 N.E.2d 873, 13 N.Y.3d 897 (N.Y. 2009).

922 N.E.2d 873 (Koehl v. Mirza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Upsher v. Ramineni
84 A.D.3d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)