Koehl v. Mirza
915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 759
This text of 915 N.E.2d 1158 (Koehl v. Mirza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Koehl v. Mirza, 915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 759 (N.Y. 2009).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, this Court’s November 27, 2007 dismissal or[760]*760der vacated and appeal reinstated (see Koehl u Mirza, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2734 [2009]; Haywood v Drown, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]).
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Haywood v. Drown
556 U.S. 729 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Koehl v. Mirza
129 S. Ct. 2734 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koehl-v-mirza-ny-2009.