Haywood v. Drown

New York Court of Appeals

Haywood v. Drown

915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 760

New York Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, order in Haywood v Drown reversed, with costs, motion to dismiss denied and case remitted to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for further proceedings, and order in Haywood v Smith modified, without costs, by denying the motion to dismiss the cause of action predicated on 42 USC § 1983 and remitting to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for further proceedings on that cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed (see Haywood v Drown, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, order in Haywood v Drown reversed, with costs, motion to dismiss denied and case remitted to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for further proceedings, and order in Haywood v Smith modified, without costs, by denying the motion to dismiss the cause of action predicated on 42 USC § 1983 and remitting to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for further proceedings on that cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed (see Haywood v Drown, 556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Haywood v. Drown, 915 N.E.2d 1158, 13 N.Y.3d 760 (N.Y. 2009).

Pincite

915 N.E.2d 1158 (Haywood v. Drown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related