Koch v. National Basketball Ass'n

245 A.D.2d 230, 666 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13401
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 245 A.D.2d 230 (Koch v. National Basketball Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koch v. National Basketball Ass'n, 245 A.D.2d 230, 666 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13401 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered June 30, 1997, which, in an action to recover damages for defendants’ alleged loss of plaintiff’s photographic slides, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of standing to sue, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the motions with leave to renew, including the request for sanctions, upon conclusion of the Bankruptcy Court hearing referred to in the order of that court dated November 26, 1996, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The doctrine of judicial estoppel, which, in a bankruptcy context, bars a party from pursuing claims not listed in a bank[231]*231ruptcy proceeding that resulted in the party’s discharge (see, Cafferty v Thompson, 223 AD2d 99, 102, lv denied 88 NY2d 815), does not apply in the absence of a final determination in the bankruptcy proceeding endorsing the party’s inconsistent position concerning his or her assets (see, Manhattan Ave. Dev. Corp. v Meit, 224 AD2d 191, lv denied 88 NY2d 803). Here, the reopening of the bankruptcy proceeding, which the Bankruptcy Court was empowered to do in its sole discretion (11 USC § 350 [b]; see, Bartle v Markson, 357 F2d 517, 523), revived the original bankruptcy proceeding and all the procedural and substantive rights of the debtor therein, plaintiff herein (In re Cassell, 41 Bankr 737, 740), and thereby nullified the final determination upon which a judicial estoppel could be predicated. Nevertheless, since the order reopening the bankruptcy proceeding was granted with the proviso that a hearing be held on notice to defendants, their remedy, as parties in interest, is to contest the reopening before the Bankruptcy Court, and should they prevail, to renew their summary judgment motions to dismiss the complaint as barred by judicial estoppel. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Wallach, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Erickson
2025 NY Slip Op 04156 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Flanders v. E. W. Howell Co., LLC
2021 NY Slip Op 02276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Orr v. Urban Am. Mgt. Corp.
2019 NY Slip Op 3739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Goodman v. Skanska USA Civ., Inc.
2019 NY Slip Op 1394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Moran Enters., Inc. v. Hurst
2018 NY Slip Op 2321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Kleinplatz v. Nathan L. Dembin & Associates, P.C.
2017 NY Slip Op 1645 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Liberatore v. Greuner
55 Misc. 3d 361 (New York Supreme Court, 2016)
MTC Commons, LLC v. Millbrook Training Ctr. & Spa, Ltd.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Davis v. Citibank
116 A.D.3d 819 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Whitehurst v. 230 Fifth, Inc.
998 F. Supp. 2d 233 (S.D. New York, 2014)
In Re Arana
456 B.R. 161 (E.D. New York, 2011)
B.N. Realty Associates v. Lichtenstein
21 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re of the Arbitration between Miller and Berti
1 A.D.2d 885 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Saini v. Cinelli Enterprises, Inc.
289 A.D.2d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Morton v. Rifkin
278 A.D.2d 129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
McIntosh Builders, Inc. v. Ball
264 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In Re Koch
229 B.R. 78 (E.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 A.D.2d 230, 666 N.Y.S.2d 630, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-national-basketball-assn-nyappdiv-1997.