Koch v. Koch

1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 255
CourtNew York Marine Court
DecidedMay 15, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 255 (Koch v. Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Marine Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koch v. Koch, 1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 255 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Opinion

McAdam, J.

These two actions have been tried, and the fact that by stipulation one was to abide the event of the other does not alter the fact. Separate verdicts were rendered in each case, separate judgments may be entered, and separate bills of costs are taxable.

Costs follow the judgment as of course. The statute fixes the amount, which is unalterable by the court (see Downing v. Marshall, 37 N. Y. 380).

Hilderbrant v. Crawford (6 Lans. 502), intimates that under such circumstances “ perhaps ” but one trial fee is taxable. The question was not directly before the court in that case. In this case it is squarely presented. Taxation affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Downing v. . Marshall
37 N.Y. 380 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Hildebrant v. Crawford
6 Lans. 502 (New York Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-koch-nymarct-1880.