Knoxville Brick Co. v. Commissioner

12 B.T.A. 431, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3544
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedJune 6, 1928
DocketDocket No. 8844.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 B.T.A. 431 (Knoxville Brick Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knoxville Brick Co. v. Commissioner, 12 B.T.A. 431, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3544 (bta 1928).

Opinion

[433]*433OPINION.

Trammell:

The only issue involved in this proceeding is the rate at which depreciation should be computed on the petitioner’s assets as carried in the “ Construction Account ” and considered as a group.

We think, from a consideration of all the evidence, that 10 per cent is a fair and reasonable rate of depreciation on the assets of the petitioner, considered as a group.

Judgment will he entered u/nder Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knoxville Brick Co. v. Commissioner
12 B.T.A. 431 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 B.T.A. 431, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knoxville-brick-co-v-commissioner-bta-1928.