Knox v. Ward
This text of Knox v. Ward (Knox v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 7 1997 TENTH CIRCUIT PATRICK FISHER Clerk
ARIC KNOX,
Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 96-6297 (D.C. No. CIV-96-652-A) RON WARD, (Western District of Oklahoma)
Respondent-Appellee.
ORDER
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge; PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Appellant has failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right by showing
the issues raised in his appeal are debatable among jurists; that a court could resolve the
issues differently; or that the questions deserve further proceedings. Essentially for the
reasons stated in the recommendation of the magistrate judge contained in the record, the
certificate of appealability is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2); Lennox v. Evans, 87 F.3d 431 (10th Cir. 1996).
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Knox v. Ward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-ward-ca10-1997.