Knox v. Pioneer Coal Co.

90 Tenn. 546
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 90 Tenn. 546 (Knox v. Pioneer Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knox v. Pioneer Coal Co., 90 Tenn. 546 (Tenn. 1891).

Opinion

Snodgrass, J.

Plaintiff was injured while aiding Shannon, another employe of the defendant company, to prop an entry in defendant’s mine, whére plaintiff was digging coal.

It was not his business to prop the mine. [547]*547While Shannon, whose duty it was to prop it, was thus engaged, lie asked plaintiff to help him. Plaintiff' left the place where he was at work and went to do so. A large piece of slate fell on his thumb and mashed it while he was so aiding Shannon. He sued for $1,000; lost, and appealed.

If it was his duty to do this repairing, he cannot recover, because the danger of it would be the object for which he was employed, and was one assumed. If it was not his duty, and he was ordered to do it by one not authorized to command him, the company would not be liable. Railroad Company v. McDaniel, 12 Lea, 386. See also 14 Lea, 374.

Accepting the invitation or obeying the order of one not authorized to command him, and voluntarily placing himself in the dangerous position where he was hurt, gave him no right of action against the company.

The company had been negligent in suffering the mine to get in a dangerous condition, and allowing it to remain so, and had plaintiff’s injury been occasioned by that negligence while he was in the line of his duty in passing under the loose slate, the company would have been liable; but it is not so when such negligence did not proximately cause the injury, but the same was caused by the voluntary act of plaintiff in placing himself under it to aid ’ another servant of the company at his request.

Let the judgment be affirmed with cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Fire Proofing Co. v. Andrews
158 F. 294 (Sixth Circuit, 1907)
Kopf v. Monroe Stone Co.
95 N.W. 72 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1903)
Ferguson v. Phoenix Cotton Hills
61 S.W. 53 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1901)
Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Fowler
56 N.E. 228 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 Tenn. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knox-v-pioneer-coal-co-tenn-1891.