Knoch v. Funke

39 N.Y. St. Rep. 139
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 4, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 139 (Knoch v. Funke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knoch v. Funke, 39 N.Y. St. Rep. 139 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

Freedman, J.

—This action having been brought by the assignee of the right of action to an accounting of an alleged partner in a co-partnership already dissolved by the death of one of the partners, and the defendant having been already examined as a party before trial at the instance of the plaintiff and having fully and circumstantially denied the partnership relations, and no competent evidence having been adduced that the books and papers sought to be discovered do contain entries establishing or tending to establish the existence of a co-partnership between plaintiff’s assignor and the admitted partners, the motion for a discovery and inspection was properly denied

The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion filed by the learned judge at special term.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 N.Y. St. Rep. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knoch-v-funke-nysuperctnyc-1891.