Knoblauch v. Little Falls Dairy Co.

241 A.D. 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts. Memorandum: There is no proof in the case as to the amount of the actual damage arising from plaintiff’s breach of the contract. The stipulated damage not appearing excessive or unconscionable on its face, considering the nature of the contract and all the circumstances of the case, the plaintiff should not succeed. Having made the contract for a stipulated damage, the burden was on the party seeking to repudiate the contract, the plaintiff, to show that such agreed damage is so exorbitant as to be in the nature of a penalty. The exact damage is wholly uncertain, difficult to prove, and in fact incapable of being ascertained except by conjecture. In such case a stipulated damage, within reason, is not a thing condemned by either law or equity. (Tode v. Gross, 127 N. Y. 480; Hackenheimer v. Kurtzmann, 235 id. 57; Kemp v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., 69 id. 45; Little v. Banks, 85 id. 258; 17 C. J. 940.) All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knoblauch v. Little Falls Dairy Co., 241 A.D. 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 910 (Knoblauch v. Little Falls Dairy Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. City of New York
59 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Chaffin v. Ramsey
555 P.2d 459 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1976)
Norwalk Door Closer Co. v. Eagle Lock & Screw Co.
220 A.2d 263 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1966)
In re the Arbitration between Judy Bond, Inc. & Kreindler
36 Misc. 2d 943 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Perma-Stone Bi County Corp. v. Ackerman
15 Misc. 2d 640 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Fahn v. Dann
207 Misc. 834 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)