Home/Connecticut Appellate Court/Knize v. Knize

Knize v. Knize

967 A.2d 142
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedApril 14, 2009
Docket29206
StatusPublished

This text of 967 A.2d 142 (Knize v. Knize) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knize v. Knize, 967 A.2d 142 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

967 A.2d 142 (2009)
113 Conn.App. 904

Waverly KNIZE
v.
Francis KNIZE.

No. 29206.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Argued March 16, 2009.
Decided April 14, 2009.

DiPENTIMA, ROBINSON and FOTI, Js.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk, Tierney, J.

In this dissolution of marriage action, the defendant, Francis Knize, appeals from the judgment awarding attorney's fees to the plaintiff, Waverly Knize. After a scrupulous review of the record and briefs in this matter and a careful consideration of the oral arguments, we conclude that the defendant's claims are without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knize v. Knize
967 A.2d 142 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
967 A.2d 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knize-v-knize-connappct-2009.