Knight v. United Medical Center
This text of Knight v. United Medical Center (Knight v. United Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARVIN KNIGHT,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-02726 (UNA)
UNITED MEDICAL CENTER, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma
pauperis (IFP). For the following reasons, the Court grants the IFP application and dismisses the
complaint.
The subject-matter jurisdiction of the federal district courts is limited and is set forth
generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available
only when a “federal question” is presented, id. § 1331, or the parties are of diverse citizenship
and the amount in controversy “exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and
costs,” id. § 1332(a). A party seeking relief in the district court must plead facts that bring the suit
within the court’s jurisdiction or suffer dismissal of the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); 12(h)(3).
Plaintiff, a resident of Washington, D.C., sues United Medical Center and Cedar Hill
Regional Medical Center (“Cedar Hill”) located in the District’s southeast quadrant. See Compl.,
ECF No. 1 at 2, 4. Plaintiff alleges cryptically that he has fluid in his eye from an assault in 2014,
has fluid in his head from a concussion he sustained in 2008, and was “sexually assaulted by a
male nurse assistant” at an unstated place and time. Id. at 4. Plaintiff “accuse[s]” United Medical Center of misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, failure to provide necessary medical care, and
discrimination but has alleged no supporting facts. Id. Plaintiff makes no allegations against Cedar
Hill, and he demands no relief. Because the complaint does not establish diversity jurisdiction or
present a federal question, this case will be dismissed by separate order.
Date: October 7, 2025 _______________________ CARL J. NICHOLS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Knight v. United Medical Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-united-medical-center-dcd-2025.