Knight v. Bowley

117 Mass. 551, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 290
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 14, 1875·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Morton, J.

The alleged trustee had in his hands a check of a third party payable to his order, which had not been paid at the time of the service of the plaintiff’i writ, and which, by the terms on which he received it, was not then presentable. He is not chargeable for this. Hancock v. Colyer, 99 Mass. 187.

The plaintiffs claim that he is chargeable because he agreed not to present the check for payment until after twelve and a half o’clock of the day of its date. If the effect of this agreement was to create a debt due absolutely to the principal defendants, the alleged trustee would be chargeable. But he states in his answer that the defendants and other owners of the vessel placed the whole matter of the sale in his hands, to act according to his judgment. The agreement for delay in presenting the check, therefore, was not a breach of his instructions or a violation of his duty, which would render him absolutely liable to the owners for the amount of the check. Trustee discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Knight v. Bowley, 117 Mass. 551, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 290 (Mass. 1875).

117 Mass. 551 (Knight v. Bowley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philip Richenburg Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Ruscito Contracting Co.
35 Mass. App. Dec. 43 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1966)
Singarella v. City of Boston
5 Mass. App. Dec. 37 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1953)
Jordan v. Lavin
66 N.E.2d 41 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Krogman v. Rice Bros.
135 N.E. 161 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Midway Five Oil Co. v. Citizens National Bank
143 P. 800 (California Court of Appeal, 1914)
Foster v. Singer
34 N.W. 395 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1887)
Fuller v. O'Brien
121 Mass. 422 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1877)