Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.

117 A.D. 913, 102 N.Y.S. 1139

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 A.D. 812 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1907·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals granted and questions certified as follows: First. May a defendant without the service of an answer by himself require a determination of the ultimate rights of himself and a codefendant as between themselves on an answer demanding such determination served on him by such codefendant? Second.- Did the Special Term under the pleadings and proof herein properly render a judgment determining as between the defendants the ownership of the bonds?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals granted and questions certified as follows: First. May a defendant without the service of an answer by himself require a determination of the ultimate rights of himself and a codefendant as between themselves on an answer demanding such determination served on him by such codefendant? Second.- Did the Special Term under the pleadings and proof herein properly render a judgment determining as between the defendants the ownership of the bonds?

Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co., 117 A.D. 913, 102 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

117 A.D. 913 (Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.