Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.

117 A.D. 913, 102 N.Y.S. 1139

This text of 117 A.D. 913 (Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co., 117 A.D. 913, 102 N.Y.S. 1139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Motion for leave to go to the Court of Appeals granted and questions certified as follows: First. May a defendant without the service of an answer by himself require a determination of the ultimate rights of himself and a codefendant as between themselves on an answer demanding such determination served on him by such codefendant? Second.- Did the Special Term under the pleadings and proof herein properly render a judgment determining as between the defendants the ownership of the bonds?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A.D. 913, 102 N.Y.S. 1139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-trust-co-v-oneonta-cooperstown-richfield-springs-railway-nyappdiv-1907.