Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.

110 A.D. 923, 96 N.Y.S. 1132

This text of 110 A.D. 923 (Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Oneonta, Cooperstown & Richfield Springs Railway Co., 110 A.D. 923, 96 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

Motion, for stay granted, unless plaintiff will stipulate that any of the bondholders may intervene and serve answers on or before 12th December, 1905, to which a reply will be served within three days without the right to said bondholders to amend their answers as of course thereafter. The trial of the action to proceed on eighteenth December as specified in th.e order of twenty-eighth November. If plaintiff will so stipulate, motion for stay denied. No costs to either party. All concurred. Chester, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D. 923, 96 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knickerbocker-trust-co-v-oneonta-cooperstown-richfield-springs-railway-nyappdiv-1905.