Klimek v. Virginia
470 U.S. 1084, 105 S. Ct. 1844, 85 L. Ed. 2d 143, 53 U.S.L.W. 3687, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1576
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 25, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1219
StatusPublished
Cited by61 cases
This text of 470 U.S. 1084 (Klimek v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Klimek v. Virginia, 470 U.S. 1084, 105 S. Ct. 1844, 85 L. Ed. 2d 143, 53 U.S.L.W. 3687, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1576 (1985).
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Va. Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aceto Corp. v. TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
953 F. Supp. 2d 1269 (S.D. Florida, 2013)
Kinnison v. City of San Antonio
699 F. Supp. 2d 881 (W.D. Texas, 2010)
Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.
299 F.3d 1313 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
T-UP, Inc. v. Consumer Protection Division
801 A.2d 173 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
Ecolab Inc. v. Paraclipse, Inc. (Doing Business as Paraclipse Automated Insect Control Division), Defendant-Cross
285 F.3d 1362 (Federal Circuit, 2002)
Midlothian Butane Gas Co. v. Hilco Electric Cooperative, Inc.
43 S.W.3d 677 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
FTC v. Pmcs, Inc.
21 F. Supp. 2d 187 (E.D. New York, 1998)
Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments, Co.
933 F. Supp. 918 (C.D. California, 1996)
RICOH CO., LTD. v. Nashua Corp.
947 F. Supp. 21 (D. New Hampshire, 1996)
Festo Corporation v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd., A/K/A Smc Corporation, and Smc Pneumatics, Inc.
72 F.3d 857 (Federal Circuit, 1996)
King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants
65 F.3d 941 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Rite-Hite Corporation v. Kelley Company, Inc.
56 F.3d 1538 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.
56 F.3d 1538 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Abbott Laboratories v. Diamedix Corporation, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.
47 F.3d 1128 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Allen v. Employers Casualty Co.
888 S.W.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California
15 F.3d 1484 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Daniel E. Dack
987 F.2d 1282 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)
Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
977 F.2d 1555 (Federal Circuit, 1993)
Amgen, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
808 F. Supp. 894 (D. Massachusetts, 1992)
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.
976 F.2d 1559 (Federal Circuit, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
470 U.S. 1084, 105 S. Ct. 1844, 85 L. Ed. 2d 143, 53 U.S.L.W. 3687, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klimek-v-virginia-scotus-1985.