Kleinberg v. Schwartz
214 A.2d 313, 46 N.J. 2, 1965 N.J. LEXIS 134
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kleinberg v. Schwartz, 214 A.2d 313, 46 N.J. 2, 1965 N.J. LEXIS 134 (N.J. 1965).
214 A.2d 313 (Kleinberg v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Associates Home Eq. Servs. v. Troup
778 A.2d 529 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
In Re Stern-Slegman-Prins Co.
86 B.R. 994 (W.D. Missouri, 1988)
Matter of Board of Educ. of Town of Boonton
494 A.2d 279 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
Historic Smithville Develop. v. Chelsea Title
445 A.2d 1174 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Poydan, Inc. v. Agia Kiriaki, Inc.
325 A.2d 838 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
Cavanagh v. MORRIS CTY. DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE
297 A.2d 594 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Yacker v. Weiner
263 A.2d 188 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Ardis v. Reed
214 A.2d 313 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)