Ardis v. Reed
214 A.2d 313, 46 N.J. 1, 1965 N.J. LEXIS 133
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Collester in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman-7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ardis v. Reed, 214 A.2d 313, 46 N.J. 1, 1965 N.J. LEXIS 133 (N.J. 1965).
214 A.2d 313 (Ardis v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boryszewski Ex Rel. Boryszewski v. Burke
882 A.2d 410 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
State v. Denofa
867 A.2d 1247 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Domurat v. Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp.
801 A.2d 423 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Lewis v. Preschel
568 A.2d 106 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Gaido v. Weiser
545 A.2d 1350 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1988)
McGowan v. Barry
510 A.2d 95 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Mockler v. RUSSMAN
246 A.2d 478 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.
238 A.2d 169 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
Brennan v. Biber
225 A.2d 742 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Kleinberg v. Schwartz
214 A.2d 313 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)