Klein v. Stop-N-Go

869 F.2d 899, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5112, 1987 WL 48854
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 16, 1987·No. No. 85-3591·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Statement by KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

Judges Jones and Celebrezze have decided not to publish their majority opinion reversing and remanding the trial court’s resolution of the above-styled case. Since I am of the firm belief that the case addresses important issues of continuing concern to both bench and bar, I have elected not to join them in their disposition of this appeal. Accordingly, I am filing my separate opinion articulating my reasons favoring the affirmance of the trial court’s disposition of the controversy, which opinion I am making available to the bench and bar through publication.

For the convenience of the bench and bar, I have attached the full text of the majority opinion as “Appendix A” to the dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Klein v. Stop-N-Go, 869 F.2d 899, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5112, 1987 WL 48854 (6th Cir. 1987).

869 F.2d 899 (Klein v. Stop-N-Go) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hastie v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
886 F. Supp. 1017 (W.D. New York, 1994)
Bojac Corp. v. Kutevac
581 N.E.2d 625 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)