Klein v. CGB Publ. PTY Ltd.
This text of 73 Misc. 3d 135(A) (Klein v. CGB Publ. PTY Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Klein v CGB Publ. PTY Ltd. (2021 NY Slip Op 51055(U)) [*1]
| Klein v CGB Publ. PTY Ltd. |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 51055(U) [73 Misc 3d 135(A)] |
| Decided on November 10, 2021 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on November 10, 2021
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Edmead, P.J., Hagler, Silvera, JJ.
570206/18
against
CGB Publishing PTY Ltd. d/b/a Franchising USA Magazine and Colin Bradbury, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Denise M. Dominguez, J.), entered June 26, 2020, which, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination denying any award of liquidated damages and limiting her recovery after inquest to the principal sum of $2,500.
Per Curiam.
Order (Denise M. Dominguez, J.), entered June 26, 2020, affirmed, without costs.
The inquest court correctly refused to award liquidated damages pursuant to Labor Law § 198(1-a). The statutory remedy of liquidated damages is "limited to actions for wage claims founded on the substantive provisions of Labor Law article 6" and such damages are not recoverable, as here, in a common-law contractual remuneration action (De La Cruz v Caddell Dry Dock & Repair Co., Inc., 22 AD3d 404, 406 [2005], quoting Gottlieb v Kenneth D. Laub & Co., 82 NY2d 457, 464 [1993], rearg denied 83 NY3d 801 [1994]; see APF Mgt. Co., LLC v Munn, 151 AD3d 668, 671 [2017]; Miles A. Kletter, D.M.D. & Andrew S. Levine, D.D.S., P.C. v Fleming, 32 AD3d 566, 567 [2006]; Slotnick v RBL Agency, 271 AD2d 365 [2000]). Nor could plaintiff interject a substantive Labor Law claim for the first time at inquest (see CPLR 3215[b]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: November 10, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Misc. 3d 135(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51055(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/klein-v-cgb-publ-pty-ltd-nyappterm-2021.