Kittredge v. Bartis
146 A. 815, 83 N.H. 588, 1929 N.H. LEXIS 115
This text of 146 A. 815 (Kittredge v. Bartis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kittredge v. Bartis, 146 A. 815, 83 N.H. 588, 1929 N.H. LEXIS 115 (N.H. 1929).
Opinion
The evidence was conflicting as to the claimed estoppel to set up the additional defence. Whether the delay was such as to make it inequitable to permit the defendants to file a belated answer, was for the trial justice to determine. Brown v. Fitzgerald, 70 N. H. 211.
Exception overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Fitzgerald
47 A. 415 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1899)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 A. 815, 83 N.H. 588, 1929 N.H. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kittredge-v-bartis-nh-1929.