Brown v. Fitzgerald
This text of 47 A. 415 (Brown v. Fitzgerald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Whether justice required the amendment was a question of fact for the trial term. Gagnon v. Connor, 64 N. H. 276.
The defendant’s evidence tended to prove that the plaintiffs had made a false and fraudulent representation to him concerning the location of the line, and that he relied on the representation. This tended to support the defendant’s allegation of deceit. Gage v. Gage, 29 N. H. 533, 543; Jones v. Emery, 40 N. H. 348, 350; Coon v. Atwell, 46 N. H. 510, 513; Messer v. Smyth, 59 N. H. 41. The motion for a nonsuit was properly denied.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 A. 415, 70 N.H. 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-fitzgerald-nh-1899.