Kisi Petelosanele Raass v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tevita Ngaluafe and Christina Ngaluafe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

692 F.2d 596, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24171
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1982
Docket82-7203
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 692 F.2d 596 (Kisi Petelosanele Raass v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tevita Ngaluafe and Christina Ngaluafe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kisi Petelosanele Raass v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Tevita Ngaluafe and Christina Ngaluafe v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 692 F.2d 596, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24171 (9th Cir. 1982).

Opinion

692 F.2d 596

Kisi Petelosanele RAASS, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
Tevita NGALUAFE and Christina Ngaluafe, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Nos. 82-7203, 82-7204.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1982.
Decided Nov. 10, 1982.

J. Scott Tims, El Monte, Cal., for petitioners.

Ingrid Hrycenko, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before CHAMBERS, ROBB* and ALARCON, Circuit Judges.

These petitioners have been ordered deported to the Tonga nation where they were born. They assert that in Tonga they would be deprived of rights to land because they do not have the right lineal history.

The relief of asylum in the United States depends on something more than generalized economic disadvantage at the destination.

There is not substantial claim of a probable political persecution as decided under the heretofore decided cases.

The records support the determination made by the Immigration Judge.

*

The Honorable Roger Robb, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Francisco Mendoza-Alvarez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
714 F.3d 1161 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
Castro-Martinez v. Holder
674 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Santos v. Ashcroft
81 F. App'x 934 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 F.2d 596, 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 24171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kisi-petelosanele-raass-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-tevita-ca9-1982.