Kirkpatrick v. Hardt
303 U.S. 626, 58 S. Ct. 762
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v. Tillinghast, 286 U. S. 560. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirkpatrick v. Hardt, 303 U.S. 626, 58 S. Ct. 762 (1938).
303 U.S. 626 (Kirkpatrick v. Hardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finn v. Railroad Commission
286 U.S. 559 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Cresswell ex rel. Di Pierro v. Tillinghast
286 U.S. 560 (Supreme Court, 1932)