Kirkpatrick v. Hardt

Supreme Court

Kirkpatrick v. Hardt

303 U.S. 626, 58 S. Ct. 762

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 28, 1938

DocketNo. 857

StatusPublished

This text of 303 U.S. 626 (Kirkpatrick v. Hardt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kirkpatrick v. Hardt, 303 U.S. 626, 58 S. Ct. 762 (1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v. Tillinghast, 286 U. S. 560. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the papers herein submitted, finds that the application for writ of certiorari was not made within the time provided by law. Act of February 13, 1925, sec. 8 (a) (43 Stat. 936, 940). Finn v. Railroad Commission, 286 U. S. 559; Cresswell &c. v. Tillinghast, 286 U. S. 560. The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore also denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 U.S. 626, 58 S. Ct. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirkpatrick-v-hardt-scotus-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack