Cresswell ex rel. Di Pierro v. Tillinghast

286 U.S. 560, 52 S. Ct. 648
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 31, 1932
DocketNo. 980
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 U.S. 560 (Cresswell ex rel. Di Pierro v. Tillinghast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cresswell ex rel. Di Pierro v. Tillinghast, 286 U.S. 560, 52 S. Ct. 648 (1932).

Opinion

The petition for writ of certiorari in this case is denied, because not filed within the time provided by law. The authority given to the Justices of this Court to extend the period for applying for a writ of certiorari not exceeding 60 days (§ 8 (a), Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 940) is to be exercised upon application duly made to a Justice prior to the expiration of the statutory period, and where an extension has been granted, as provided, a further extension may be had only upon application duly made before the expiratioli of the extended period.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirkpatrick v. Hardt
303 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1938)
Cherami v. Cantrelle
287 U.S. 568 (Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 U.S. 560, 52 S. Ct. 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cresswell-ex-rel-di-pierro-v-tillinghast-scotus-1932.