Kirkendall v. State
786 So. 2d 1171, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 359, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1017, 2001 WL 521006
Opinion
We have for review Kirkendall v. State, 749 So.2d 571 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We vacate the decision of the district court and remand for reconsideration upon application of our decisions in Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); McKnight v. State, 769 So.2d 1039 (Fla.2000); and Ellis v. State, 762 So.2d 912 (Fla.2000).
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirkendall v. State, 786 So. 2d 1171, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 359, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1017, 2001 WL 521006 (Fla. 2001).
786 So. 2d 1171 (Kirkendall v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ellis v. State
762 So. 2d 912 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
McKnight v. State
769 So. 2d 1039 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
State v. Cotton
769 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Grant v. State
770 So. 2d 655 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Kirkendall v. State
749 So. 2d 571 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)